See a sample of blatant deprivation of rights and obstruction of justice!
Review: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
I have reached out to many legal aid organizations but in spite of ‘obstruction’ and
many other unethical behaviors…some have attempted to use the statutes of limitations
to dissuade even though the laws clearly state ‘statutes of limitations are not applicable.
I may not be an attorney but like many others, I love reading and studying case laws
and the constitutional laws, etc.
I am constantly misrepresented by those who are in a position to thwart justice and I do
not have to tell you how people rally against you when suing governmental agencies; such as, the police. The first response commonly used is, “It’s YOUR tax dollars…”
Again, I recognize that this is an extremely difficult task but I have faith that this can be
remedied. The following pages are actual copies of a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
which clearly demonstrates how the courts own rules and procedures are misused,
ignored and/or are completely disregarded for the purposes of deliberately denying equal justice and done in an effort to support the deprivation of rights. There will be no question as to how the entire process is clearly rigged.
As we begin to review the many supporting documentation provided in this publication, the first thing that should be addressed is the Rules and Procedures that are supposed to govern the judicial process.
In the previous publication, INVISIBLE: Living in America Without Rights we reviewed the basics regarding the filing of the lawsuit or Complaint.
The following page provides information regarding the Courts Clerks duties when accepting Complaints of Judicial Misconduct in accordance the Rules for Judicial-
Conduct with Eleventh Circuit Judicial Conduct and Disability Rules.
(b) Distribution of Copies. The clerk must promptly send copies of a complaint filed under Rule 6 to the chief judge or the judge authorized to act as chief judge under Rule 25(1), and copies of complaints filed under Rule 5 or 6 to each subject judge. The clerk must retain the original complaint. Any further distribution should be as provided by local rule.
(c) Complaints Against Non-covered Persons. If the clerk receives a complaint about a person not holding an office described in Rule 4, the clerk must not accept the complaint for filing under these Rules.
(d) Receipt of Complaint about a Judge and Another Non-covered Person. If a complaint is received about a judge described in Rule 4 and a person not holding an office described in Rule 4, the clerk must accept the complaint for filing under these Rules only with regard to the judge and must inform the complainant of the limitation.
Note: This is a copy of the first page of the Complaint of Judicial Misconduct that was EDITED by Courts/Clerks to reflect a receipt date of August 12, 2015. The red/orange arrows and text highlighted are used to identify specific information.
This Document should have been stamped and assigned a docket # at time of submission, per Court Rules…Instead, the date was changed from August 11, 2015 to August 12, 2015.
The notation at the bottom of this filing which alerted Courts of attachments, was edited out and/or removed.
This filing had 69+ pages of supporting documentation. Each labeled as COM, numbered and listed as attachments.
These filing were bound; however, Courts clerk requested unbound copy (as shown in email request).
C.O.A. CLERK DID NOT FOLLOW PROCEDURE because there was no docket number assigned and the stamp used was not initialed. In fact, when I question him about the Docket #…he gave me the copy of the first page that was stamped with different stamp and it was initialed.
When I met with Kennerly to give him the requested unbound copy, he provided me with a copy of stamped C.O.M. with a Docket # (finally). it was nothing like the copy that the courts initially returned.
YouTube Video - https://youtu.be/RVhmbb7336o?t=5m14s
When I requested a cover sheet because the initial clerk only provided a generic date stamp, the executive clerk gave me a copy which was completely different from the generic stamp and it included the case docket number but it did not reflect that it came from my bound copies. The ruling still never addresses that the courts ignored clerks were supposed to serve Defendants.
Keep in mind that the reason for the filing of the COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT was due to this same kind of behavior involving manipulating motions and filings; such as, a ‘switch-a-roo,' Clerks editing filings, withholding and obstruction.
The judge neglected to reference further:
However, Rule (3) (A) does include: …If the decision or ruling is alleged to be the result of an improper motive, e.g., a bribe, ex parte contact, racial or ethnic bias, or improper conduct in rendering a decision or ruling, such as personally derogatory remarks irrelevant to the issues, the complaint is not cognizable to the extent that it attacks the merits.
(B) an allegation about delay in rendering a decision or ruling, unless the allegation concerns an improper motive in delaying a particular decision. With regard to Rule 3(h)(3)(B), a complaint of delay in a single case is excluded as merits-related...But, by the same token, ...or an allegation of deliberate delay in a single case arising out of an illicit motive, is not merits-related.
In addition, this complaint also addresses the conduct of the Courts and not only the rulings but the following of its own Rules and Procedures.
The Bound COM/ Judicial Complaint included 70+ pages of documents supporting alleged misconduct;
1. Litigant…was treated in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner; AND
2. The Court(s) delay of this Complaint arose out of an illicit motive and in order to assist the Def. who are a governmental entity, evade accountability; AND
3. The judge's used their office to offer special treatment when minority Pltf. files suit against governmental agencies; AND
Discrimination against minority female litigant on account of race, ethnicity, sex…through manipulation of filings/docket entries; thus, obstructing justice.'
See Bound COM pgs. 8-77.
Each act alleged, leads to a substantial and widespread lowering the public’s confidence in the courts. Each instance listed would never have happened so blatantly if Pltf. were not a minority female filing in Forma Pauperis.
In my cover letter for Petition for Review, I humbly requested to meet with the Committee directly so that I may explain each allegation to show misconduct and compare the submitted Complaint with the one that the Chief Judge was provided.
Each page of attachments was referenced within the Complaint and highlighted with explanation demonstrating the alleged misconduct.
I was never contacted and I never received a copy of this 01-20-2016 decision. Plaintiff decided to check online and only then discovered the Ruling.
Being ostracized from society has been very difficult but it allows insight to what others find easy to overlook. Because of my current treatment, it is clear that I am not the one living in the past and that my 'so-called' past is alive and is currently kicking me in the head! After all these attempts to resolve my predicament, I was brokenhearted. I would have never thought that this would be possible. Not in America, I refused to believe my eyes.
What could one person have done to justify this kind of exile? All I did was request those rights that I was told that I had and I stood up for myself. There had to be some type of mass deception or serious manipulation at work. I have never given permission for any filming or video surveillance's but my privacy is constantly violated.
It is implied that this is some type of protection but it appears that the only protection that I need is from those that are keeping me held down and persecuted. These are the same people that have orchestrated all events to ensure that there trap holds. There is always reference made to someone being a ‘pet.’ There is always the use of the words stay or sit. I am no one’s pet. These derogatory comments and references are made too many times to be coincidences.
All of the cities that I have lived in have been supportive of my oppression. No one wants to address the gross misconducts, cover-ups and blatant criminal activity.
I have spent many pain-staking hours writing, editing and revising my first book and I have made some changes in my life to allow for a short period of time to promote the book as well. Of course, I expected some opposition in my efforts to express my side of events.
I wanted to have an outlet to express to those who would give me a chance to stand up for myself against all the lies and painted pictures of my being this self-centered villain going around destroying lives. At least that is how I felt that I was being treated. It is hard to accept mistreatment when you don’t feel that it is warranted.
I traced every footstep and every move that I made for as far back as I could to try to figure out why I was chosen to carry this burden of guilt that people would thrust upon me, daily. I made some harsh discoveries about my families past and about the world that I am forced to live in.
Unaware of the depths that some will go to in an attempt to inflict harm on others; I went through life oblivious to some of the traps and snares. Although some would call this life that I lead - a blessed one, I don’t always feel that way.
If you don’t like a person for whatever the reasons are, it doesn’t give you the right to take their life from them. There should never be an opportunity for others to have the ability to gang up on one person simply because they can.
When a system enables or creates an environment where citizens are encouraged to publicly violate, harass, and abuse any one person at will, the system itself willfully promotes slavery.
Using the misinformed public to administer some kind of mob justice or simply allowing the angry masses to ensure injustice continues is cruel and inhumane.
If these same people who choose to either ignore or actively participate in this wicked game of harming and hindering were alive in the days when blatant slavery was running rampant…’we’ would all still be slaves in physical chains.
I used the words ‘we’ because it is not just a black thing, it is the poor people who have always suffered. It is clear that I have expressed my viewpoint on reaching a point of resolution. It is unacceptable for me to be disregarded and cut off from justice when I know that many are able to enjoy the luxury of having rights. Regardless of what lies and manipulations are being promoted, I have not hurt anyone.
Available for Download and in Print!
Intellectual Property Rights Licensing Available! (click below)